Keep hearings, preparation tasks and unfinished work connected, even when several requests are moving at once.
Request accessA court-stated hearing date, a date reported by a party, a possible calculated deadline and your own preparation target do not carry the same certainty. The intended overview keeps each date connected to its source and the work it governs. Missing inputs or unsupported calculations need to remain visible before a possible date is relied on.
Several requests can share evidence while keeping different schedules and completion states. The planned workflow links tasks to their proceeding, owner, dependencies and next trigger. A continuance or new order should identify affected work and preserve unrelated schedules. Marking one task complete should not imply that service, proof filing or the wider case is finished.
Distinguish dates stated by the court from reported dates and preparation targets.
See which task, request or response a date belongs to.
Revisit affected work when an order, hearing date or record changes.
The planned case overview keeps separate proceedings and their schedules connected to shared case context. Moving one hearing should flag its dependent work without silently changing unrelated tasks.
A possible calculated deadline is not a confirmed court date. Missing inputs and unsupported rules need visible review.
Our approachNo. The intended interface distinguishes confirmed source dates, reported dates, possible calculations and preparation targets. Their basis and uncertainty should remain visible.
No. Notification delivery, your acknowledgment and actual completion are separate states. The record should show what evidence supports completion.